[r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?

From: David Van Horn <dvanhorn>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:09:54 -0400

On 6/25/07, AndrevanTonder <andre at het.brown.edu> wrote:
> There is in fact a trivial solution to porting legacy macros
> using underscore. Simply put them in a library where you use
>
> (import (except (r6rs base) _))

Isn't this a syntax violation? This excludes `_' from (meta 0),
implicitly, but (r6rs base) provides `_' only at (meta 1).

David
Received on Tue Jun 26 2007 - 20:09:54 UTC