On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 01:41:50AM +0000, John Cowan wrote:
> Summary: Editors, "the unspecified value" won't fly. Pick something
> else and insist on it.
>
> 5:16:59 <twb> The value that is not dead which can eternal lie.
> 05:17:24 <twb> The value that shall not be named.
> 05:17:33 <arcus> absurdity? :] \
> 05:17:37 <twb> The elder value.
> 05:17:37 <mbishop> hah that's what I was thinking twb
> 05:18:20 <astecp> NaV
>
> I had proposed "the content-free value" earlier; I would also propose
> "the useless value".
Seriously, my personal preference is for `the meaningless value'.
--
Trent Buck, Student Errant
Received on Sun Oct 01 2006 - 19:51:59 UTC