[r6rs-discuss] "Unspecified"

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Fri Sep 22 11:41:56 2006

Jeff Read scripsit:

> A cynical external observer could infer that this is a bike shed issue.

Indeed. Some alternative names proposed on #scheme:

5:16:59 <twb> The value that is not dead which can eternal lie.
05:17:24 <twb> The value that shall not be named.
05:17:33 <arcus> absurdity? :] \
05:17:37 <twb> The elder value.
05:17:37 <mbishop> hah that's what I was thinking twb
05:18:20 <astecp> NaV

I had proposed "the content-free value" earlier; I would also propose
"the useless value".

Summary: Editors, "the unspecified value" won't fly. Pick something
else and insist on it.

-- 
John Cowan  cowan_at_ccil.org   http://ccil.org/~cowan
It's the old, old story.  Droid meets droid.  Droid becomes chameleon.
Droid loses chameleon, chameleon becomes blob, droid gets blob back
again.  It's a classic tale.  --Kryten, Red Dwarf
Received on Fri Sep 22 2006 - 11:41:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC