On Nov 14, Andre van Tonder wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> > I think that unixisms don't belong in the document too, but
> > there's a very strong point for allowing them in some portable
> > way.
>
> I am not sure I see the point to which you are referring.
In some implementations, you need to write:
#!/...
(scheme code)
and in others:
#!/...
!#
(scheme code)
My point is that it is useful to make one work with all
implementations.
> This is a file format issue. It seems inconsistent that r6rs does
> not address file format for libraries, yet chooses to do so for scripts,
> and in a way that is so badly broken.
[I don't know what's broken, and I don't make any argument about
whatever the text currently says.]
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://www.barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
Received on Tue Nov 14 2006 - 14:34:46 UTC