[r6rs-discuss] The library name "rnrs" is overly precious

From: Lynn Winebarger <owinebar>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 07:27:05 -0400

On 7/2/07, Dave Gurnell <d.j.gurnell at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From 5.96 11: "This chapter describes Scheme's /(rnrs base (6))/
> > library [...]." Seems a bit twee to call the library /rnrs/. How
> > about
> > just plain /scheme/ for libraries described in the Standard?
>
> +1 for "scheme"


   RRS would be more accurate. The Revised Reports are not the only Scheme
standards.

Lynn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/attachments/20070702/f3013df7/attachment.htm
Received on Mon Jul 02 2007 - 07:27:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC