[r6rs-discuss] Library naming ambiguity?

From: AndrevanTonder <andre>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:51:17 -0400 (EDT)

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Michael Sperber wrote:

> AndrevanTonder <andre at het.brown.edu> writes:
>
>> [...] a big reason I like your proposal more is that it avoids
>> proliferation of parentheses.
>
> On the other hand, throwing an extra set of parens around the `import'
> and `export' clauses (or making the body of a library also a clause)
> would make the set of possible clauses extensible in future revisions of
> the report in a backward-compatible manner.

True, but that is orthogonal to the issue discussed so far in the thread
(ambiguity and parentheses within the import clause), correct?

Cheers
Andre
Received on Thu Jun 14 2007 - 08:51:17 UTC