[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Confusing formatting in report section 9.16

From: Michael Sperber <sperber>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:54:05 +0200

John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> writes:

> Summary: Confusing formatting in report section 9.16
>
> The second sentence in the description of apply reads:
>
> *Proc* should accept *n* arguments, where *n* is number of
> *arg*s plus the length of *args*.
>
> The distinction between "*arg*s" and "*args*" is too subtle to
> be easily seen. I suggest replacing "*args*" with "*more-args*"
> or the like. Also, s/is number/is the number/.

Fixed. Thanks!

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Fri Jun 08 2007 - 05:54:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC