[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] last-element behavior of for-each

From: Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum>
Date: Tue Oct 3 06:14:20 2006

On Oct 2, 2006, at 10:14 AM, Per Bothner wrote:

> The specification of for-each (in R5RS as well as R6RS) has a weird
> asymmetry in that the result value is the result of calling the
> function
> on the last elements.

Just a note that the issue under discussion need not be restricted to
for-each since it applies to many other functions as well (exists,
forall, ...).

Aziz,,,
Received on Tue Oct 03 2006 - 06:14:15 UTC