Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum at cs.indiana.edu> writes:
> Is that "Co" a typo for something else? Or should it just be removed?
No, it's intentional. Co character are meant for the private use of
*applications*---they're not unassigned, which is something different.
That's why Scheme implementations should treat them generically and
allow them in <constituent>.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Sat Sep 22 2007 - 11:06:01 UTC