> I personally view some of the examples presented as contraptions rather
> than "elegant constructs". So yes, the answer to your question is very
> very obvious.
So the answer is obvious to me, to you (and perhaps to Shiro), only it's
not the same answer...
Seriously and objectively though, do you have a more elegant rewrite of
those contraptions? Or do you think that allowing those contraptions would
impact performance?
Best,
Dan Muresan
http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~muresan
Received on Tue Oct 03 2006 - 04:10:05 UTC