[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Bytes<->vector procedures

From: Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum>
Date: Tue Nov 14 19:12:50 2006

On Nov 14, 2006, at 3:31 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote:

> Since these can be implemented extremely efficiently, it seems a pity
> not
> to provide them.

Sorry, I don't get it. What does efficiency of implementation have
anything to do with inclusion in R6RS? I can implement these in many
implementations efficiently already.

Aziz,,,
Received on Tue Nov 14 2006 - 19:12:38 UTC