[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] No defaults given for sealed and opaque

---
This message is a formal comment which was submitted to formal-comment_at_r6rs.org, following the requirements described at: http://www.r6rs.org/process.html
---
Name        : Andre van Tonder
Email       : andre at het.brown.edu
Type        : omission
Priority    : minor
Component   : records
Version     : 5.92 libraries
Pages       : 15-18 
Dependencies: None
Description:
------------
In the explicit and implicit naming syntactic layers, it is not stated what the 
default values for sealedness and opaqueness will be if the corresponding 
clauses are absent.
Suggestion:
-----------
Specify default values of #f for sealed? and (probably the safer option) #t for 
opaque?