[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] multiple values and tail contexts

From: Michael Sperber <sperber>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 17:06:35 +0200

Jed Davis <r6rs at jdev.users.panix.com> writes:

> The definition of "values" claims to specify exactly those
> continuations which may accept other than one argument, and -- for
> example -- those in which the <consequent> and <alternate> of an "if"
> form (section 9.5.3) are evaluated are not among them;

`if' doesn't create new continuations for <consequent> and <alternate>.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Sat Jun 16 2007 - 11:06:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC