[r6rs-discuss] Shouldn't it be (rrs)?

From: Anton van Straaten <anton>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:29:55 -0400

Andre van Tonder wrote:
> In any case, shouldn't it be
>
> (rrs)
> (rrs (6))
> (rrs base)
>
> and so on?

+1

(This was my preference; I think that rnrs was considered the more
familiar abbreviation.)

Anton
Received on Thu May 24 2007 - 11:29:55 UTC