[r6rs-discuss] Shouldn't it be (rrs)?

From: AndrevanTonder <andre>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:01:36 -0400 (EDT)

In any case, shouldn't it be

   (rrs)
   (rrs (6))
   (rrs base)

and so on? The current (rnrs (6)) sounds, to me, like

   "The sixth version of the n-th report",

which is a bit nonsensical.

Andre
Received on Thu May 24 2007 - 10:01:36 UTC