heh, thanks for posting this.
i guess this begs the next question:
is r6rs the 'most pragmatic and internally beautiful' thing?
and have its innovations (or lack thereof) been the product of a feedback
loop revising flaws in the existing standard, or is it something else entirely?
-elf
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Robby Findler wrote:
> One answer to this was posted on the plt-scheme blog:
>
> http://blog.plt-scheme.org/2007/06/r6rs-is-perfect.html
>
> Robby
>
> On 10/30/07, Elf <elf at ephemeral.net> wrote:
>>
>> this is a query directed at those in support of r6rs:
>>
>> does r6rs represent a manifestation of the Right Thing?
>>
>>
>> reason for this query: it seems as though the major difference between the
>> various factions boils down to the Rightness or lack thereof of r6rs. do
>> those defending r6rs claim that it is the Right Thing? this is unclear.
>>
>>
>> -elf
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> r6rs-discuss mailing list
>> r6rs-discuss at lists.r6rs.org
>> http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
>>
>
Received on Tue Oct 30 2007 - 08:57:46 UTC