[r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Mon Mar 19 21:04:14 2007

William D Clinger scripsit:

> Finally, I'd like to note that the current draft R6RS
> does not actually preclude bucky bits. An implementation
> could add bucky bits to characters while making those
> bits invisible to all of the standard operations on
> characters and strings.

By the same token, one might add property lists to symbols,
or for that matter add property lists to characters.

-- 
In my last lifetime,                            John Cowan
I believed in reincarnation;                    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
in this lifetime,                               cowan_at_ccil.org
I don't.  --Thiagi
Received on Mon Mar 19 2007 - 21:04:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC