Thomas Lord scripsit:
> So, the answer is "no," thus CL did not "regress" in the way that you
> claim. Since you recognize that that *would* have been a regression
> then, to be consistent, you should either agree that the restrictions in
> the R6 core are a regression or else convincingly distinguish the two cases.
I deny that there are any such restrictions in the R6 core.
> I'm not sure why you bring that up, but...
Primarily because no Scheme standard since RRRS has provided
p-lists, but Chez does, and so does Chicken if you use a
special build option. Other Schemes may too, for all I know.
--
LEAR: Dost thou call me fool, boy? John Cowan
FOOL: All thy other titles http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
thou hast given away: cowan at ccil.org
That thou wast born with.
Received on Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:18:48 UTC