John Cowan wrote:
> Per Bothner scripsit:
>
>> Is there any scenario where you'd want anything other than:
>>
>> (eqv? +nan.0 +nan.0) => #t
>
> Eqv? on unboxed floats can be implemented by bitwise comparison
> rather than floating-point equality.
Yes. I'm unsure whether to read your comment as a parenthetical
remark or an argument against my proposal. If the latter, I don't
understand it.
--
--Per Bothner
per_at_bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
Received on Thu Nov 23 2006 - 15:19:02 UTC