AndrevanTonder <andre at het.brown.edu> writes:
> I think the sentence would still be at best ambiguous, and perhaps somewhat
> inaccurate. I can think of objections to "defined by a procedure",
> "calls a procedure", "run", "when expanding", and "specifically"
> (since this is only one relevant use case). I would suggest instead
> something like:
>
> For example, if a macro transformer procedure
> calls a procedure from another library, then the latter library must
> be instantiated before expanding any use of the macro.
How about:
> For example, if a macro transformer calls a procedure from library A,
> then the library A must be instantiated before expanding any use of
> the macro in library B. Library A may not be needed when library B is
> eventually run as part of a program, or it may be needed for run time
> of library B, too.
?
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Tue Aug 14 2007 - 05:39:31 UTC