[r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:52:18 -0400

Elf scripsit:

> however, all older implementations that i am aware of support r4rs.

That's because the sole surviving R3RS implementation, T, has been
in hibernation for lo these many years (and compatibility was never
guaranteed for T anyhow).

-- 
John Cowan    cowan at ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
Objective consideration of contemporary phenomena compel the conclusion
that optimum or inadequate performance in the trend of competitive
activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity,
but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be
taken into account. --Ecclesiastes 9:11, Orwell/Brown version

Received on Sun Oct 28 2007 - 20:52:18 UTC