[r6rs-discuss] Immutable record equivalence
Reading through eqv? for records, it seems like if all the fields of a
record are immutable, than equivalence should be defined by
equivalence of the field contents.
--Mark
Received on Tue Aug 14 2007 - 00:13:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC