[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove double phase semantics

From: AndrevanTonder <andre>
Date: Sun Nov 26 22:22:22 2006

Given the controversial nature of the issue, it seems clear to me that the
current compromise language of the draft is the best one can hope for under the
circumstances.

For this reason, consider the formal comment withdrawn.

As for my reference implementation, since I have implemented both shared and
separate-binding semantics, I will provide a configuration switch whereby
either semantics can be toggled, starting with its next release.

Andre
Received on Sun Nov 26 2006 - 22:18:01 UTC