[r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS

From: Elf <elf>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:35:38 -0700 (PDT)

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Thomas Lord wrote:

> Elf wrote:
>>
>> how are we defining 'most actively maintained' and 'serious'? most srfi's?
>> largest user bases? most frequent version-control checkins? largest
>> support
>> library set? most uptake outside the scheme community?
>
> How about best funding?
>
> -t
>
>

funding in terms of 'programmer time' or 'suckers money' ? :)


-elf
Received on Sun Oct 28 2007 - 13:35:38 UTC