[r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS

From: Elf <elf>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:31:38 -0700 (PDT)

>> everyone else? heres a fun question: find which implementations
>> have the most code written for them before determining who gets the
>> most weight. ive done this already. the voices you are saying
>> should carry the most weight in general should not.
>
> Unless I had a serious case of reality breakdown, the weight was given
> to all scheme programmers.

kent dyvbig and thomas lord were saying that the three implementations who have
indicated that they will support r6rs should be given more weight than the
10 or so that have said that they never will or that they dont have the time.

-elf
Received on Sun Oct 28 2007 - 13:31:38 UTC