[r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Thomas Lord <lord>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:49:50 -0700

Elf wrote:
>
> how are we defining 'most actively maintained' and 'serious'? most
> srfi's?
> largest user bases? most frequent version-control checkins? largest
> support
> library set? most uptake outside the scheme community?

How about best funding?

-t
Received on Sun Oct 28 2007 - 13:49:50 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Elf: "[r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS"
Previous message: Abdulaziz Ghuloum: "[r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS"
In reply to: Elf: "[r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS"
Next in thread: Elf: "[r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS"
Reply: Elf: "[r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC