[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Drop enumerations library?

From: AndrevanTonder <andre>
Date: Thu Nov 2 11:00:49 2006

On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:

> There is no abstraction to break and no forging going on in the previous
> example. The symbol little is the symbol little, regardless of how you got
> it.

I agree completely. While the syntax "(endianness ---)" might give
the appearance of providing an abstraction, this is a false illusion. Given
this, I don't see why it is occupying useful namespace.

Cheers
Andre
Received on Thu Nov 02 2006 - 10:57:12 UTC