[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Scheme should not be changed to be case sensitive.

From: Thomas Lord <lord>
Date: Tue Nov 14 15:06:08 2006

Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
>
> U+03c2 is a fine canonical choice here. Why can't they all be eq?

Isn't it the case in Scheme that, for all singleton procedures P and
all values V1 and V2 that

    (eq? V1 V2) => (eq? (P V1) (P V2))

-t
Received on Tue Nov 14 2006 - 15:06:12 UTC