[r6rs-discuss] "Unspecified"

From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak>
Date: Mon Sep 25 06:12:07 2006

William D Clinger <will_at_ccs.neu.edu> writes:

> that partial solution does not solve the problem for other
> R5RS-compatible code, e.g.
>
> (let* ((v (f ...))
> (ignored (vector-set! v i ...))
> (v2 (g v ...)))
> ...)

Ignoring R5RS compatibility, my preferred way for writing such code
would be:

   (define v (f ...))
   (vector-set! v i ...)
   (define v2 (g v ...))
   ...

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak_at_knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
Received on Mon Sep 25 2006 - 06:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC