[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo

---
This message is a formal comment which was submitted to formal-comment_at_r6rs.org, following the requirements described at: http://www.r6rs.org/process.html
---
Submitter's name: Reinder Verlinde
submitter's email address: anmwzj_at_hetnet.nl
type of issue: Enhancement
priority: Trivial
R6RS component: Other (Textual)
version of the report:  5.91
one-sentence summary: 'of course' should not be used in the report
Section 1.9 (page 8, right column, just past the first table) reads:
    "The ? is, of course, not needed for number or boolean literals"
               ^^^^^^^^^
I think that "of course" should be removed, because a) it is only  
obvious for those with a Scheme or Lisp background and b) a language  
specification should not make any assumptions about a reader's  
knowledge.