[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Michael Sperber <sperber>
Date: Sun Oct 22 11:34:02 2006

anmwzj_at_hetnet.nl writes:

> "The ? is, of course, not needed for number or boolean literals"
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> I think that "of course" should be removed,

Will do, thanks!

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla

Received on Sun Oct 22 2006 - 11:33:52 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: dyb_at_cs.indiana.edu: "[r6rs-discuss] R6RS mail archives, formal comments, next r6rs draft"
Previous message: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo in Section 1.5"
In reply to: anmwzj_at_hetnet.nl: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC