[r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:02:12 -0400

William D Clinger scripsit:
> John Cowan wrote:
> > > In other words, how much of the growing size of
> > > the R6RS can be blamed on the Scheme community's
> > > habit of using interpreters instead of compilers?
> >
> > Is that really true?
>
> I think the answer is "not much at all", but it
> was an interesting question. As proof, I would
> point to your reply and Alan Watson's.

I believe you have misunderstood me. I meant:
Is it really true that the Scheme community as a whole
prefers interpreters to compilers? Or that there are
more Scheme projects delivered under interpreters than
compilers? Or whatever presupposition you had in mind.

-- 
You're a brave man! Go and break through the            John Cowan
lines, and remember while you're out there              cowan at ccil.org
risking life and limb through shot and shell,           http://ccil.org/~cowan
we'll be in here thinking what a sucker you are!
        --Rufus T. Firefly
Received on Mon Jun 25 2007 - 20:02:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC