Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:
> In <11. Bytes objects>, I suggest using the term "byte-vector"
> instead of "bytes." A plural name for the type will lead to
> confusion and is inconsistent with the names used for all other
> Scheme types. Even if "byte-vector" isn't chosen, please consider a
> singular name. I'd much rather say "two byte-vectors" instead of
> "two byteses" or "two objects of type bytes" or the ambiguous "two
> bytes."
+1
--
Using RELAX NG compact syntax to John Cowan <cowan_at_ccil.org>
develop schemas is one of the simple http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
pleasures in life....
--Jeni Tennison <cowan_at_ccil.org>
Received on Tue Nov 14 2006 - 12:37:38 UTC