Michael Sperber scripsit:
> If this change were made, should the endianness even be optional? I.e.
>
> (utf16->string b (endianness big) #f)
>
> would be equivalent to what's currently
>
> (utf16->string b)
>
> Right?
Correct. I'm not very happy with boolean arguments: it's easy to
forget which sense means what, but that's a detail.
--
In politics, obedience and support John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
are the same thing. --Hannah Arendt http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Sun May 27 2007 - 21:46:48 UTC