[r6rs-discuss] Question about "expand time" vs. "execution time"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 21:38:07 -0400

Brian C. Barnes scripsit:

> (define-syntax ttf ...)
> (define ttf +)
>
> (ttf 5 3)
> (apply ttf (list ... ))
>
> Are these valid? Does "ttf" now refer to a macro, or to the "+" procedure?

The latter definition overrides the former, at least at the top level.

-- 
In politics, obedience and support      John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
are the same thing.  --Hannah Arendt    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

Received on Sun May 27 2007 - 21:38:07 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Cowan: "[r6rs-discuss] string->utfX and utfX-string questions"
Previous message: Brian C. Barnes: "[r6rs-discuss] Question about "expand time" vs. "execution time""
In reply to: Brian C. Barnes: "[r6rs-discuss] Question about "expand time" vs. "execution time""
Next in thread: Brian C. Barnes: "[r6rs-discuss] Question about "expand time" vs. "execution time""
Reply: Brian C. Barnes: "[r6rs-discuss] Question about "expand time" vs. "execution time""

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC