[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] right shift formula and bit-field signedness
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Daniel Villeneuve <
daniel_villeneuve
>
Date
: Wed Mar 14 20:45:18 2007
Another minor wording point:
10) Mention ei4 in intro.
-- Daniel
Received on
Wed Mar 14 2007 - 20:44:41 UTC
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
AndrevanTonder: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Why are simple conditions so different from records"
Previous message
:
MichaelL_at_frogware.com: "[r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but...."
In reply to
:
Daniel Villeneuve: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] right shift formula and bit-field signedness"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC