[r6rs-discuss] real->single and real->double

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Alan Watson <alan>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:34:07 -0500

In their response to formal comment 122, the editors indicated that they
were going to remove real->single and real->double, but these still
appear in the latest draft. Is this just an oversight?

I personally would be happy for them to continue to be part of the standard.

Regards,

Alan
Received on Fri May 25 2007 - 12:34:07 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Thomas Lord: "[r6rs-discuss] R6 counterproposal"
Previous message: Alan Watson: "[r6rs-discuss] &i/o-file-exists-not"
Next in thread: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] real->single and real->double"
Reply: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] real->single and real->double"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC