[r6rs-discuss] real->single and real->double

From: Michael Sperber <sperber>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 09:55:07 +0200

Alan Watson <alan at alan-watson.org> writes:

> In their response to formal comment 122, the editors indicated that they
> were going to remove real->single and real->double, but these still
> appear in the latest draft. Is this just an oversight?

Yes. Thanks for noticing!

> I personally would be happy for them to continue to be part of the standard.

I'm afraid, at least for now, that's been decided: They'll go in the
next draft.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Sun May 27 2007 - 03:55:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC