Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk scripsit:
> "Jason Orendorff" <jason.orendorff_at_gmail.com> writes:
>
> > For the sake of putting forth a realistic proposal, I suggest adopting
> > (only) the non-stable functional list-sort and the non-stable
> > four-parameter in-place vector-sort! from SRFI-32.
+1
> If any sorting is adopted, I call for making Schwartzian transform
> available. People must not be advised to pass
> (lambda (x y) (< (car x) (car y)))
> as the comparison. They should pass
> car <
> as two separate arguments (or just car with < being the default).
If this is a convenience feature, I'm against it. If it supposedly
provides improved performance or function of some sort, I'd like to
see how.
--
Possession is said to be nine points of the law, John Cowan
but that's not saying how many points the law might have. cowan_at_ccil.org
--Thomas A. Cowan (law professor and my father)
Received on Mon Oct 02 2006 - 17:08:49 UTC