"Jason Orendorff" <jason.orendorff_at_gmail.com> writes:
> For the sake of putting forth a realistic proposal, I suggest adopting
> (only) the non-stable functional list-sort and the non-stable
> four-parameter in-place vector-sort! from SRFI-32.
If any sorting is adopted, I call for making Schwartzian transform
available. People must not be advised to pass
(lambda (x y) (< (car x) (car y)))
as the comparison. They should pass
car <
as two separate arguments (or just car with < being the default).
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ qrczak_at_knm.org.pl
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
Received on Mon Oct 02 2006 - 15:34:25 UTC