[r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....
> Then we'd have uchar and ustring and, perhaps,
> fewer backward-compatibility issues.
In case it wasn't clear what that meant: in the name of backward
compatibility the new Unicode char type implements various (Unicode)
character operations that really only make sense for (Unicode) strings.
Received on Wed Mar 14 2007 - 19:25:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC