[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Mon Feb 26 12:13:45 2007

Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:

> We've already dropped one of the core features of the language, its
> REPL, from the specification. Let's not go any further and lose the
> prototyping-friendly nature of the language.

Can you mention the part of R5RS that mandates a REPL?

-- 
How they ever reached any  conclusion at all    <cowan_at_ccil.org>
is starkly unknowable to the human mind.        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --"Backstage Lensman", Randall Garrett

Received on Mon Feb 26 2007 - 12:13:20 UTC