On 6/26/07, AndrevanTonder <andre at het.brown.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, David Van Horn wrote:
>
> > On 6/25/07, AndrevanTonder <andre at het.brown.edu> wrote:
> >> There is in fact a trivial solution to porting legacy macros
> >> using underscore. Simply put them in a library where you use
> >>
> >> (import (except (r6rs base) _))
> >
> > Isn't this a syntax violation? This excludes `_' from (meta 0),
> > implicitly, but (r6rs base) provides `_' only at (meta 1).
>
> No - it excludes _ from all meta-levels at which (r6rs base) would have
> otherwise provided it [...].
Sorry, I'm clearly misunderstanding something in the draft. Can you
point out where this is specified?
David
Received on Tue Jun 26 2007 - 22:01:36 UTC