Felix Klock <pfr6rs_at_pnkfx.org> writes:
> On Feb 5, 2007, at 7:18 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
>> I see your point for `letrec', which you describe separately.
>> However, for `letrec*' order of evaluation is specified. So the
>> comment about "exhaustive search of the order-of-evaluation space"
>> doesn't seem to apply. Am I missing something?
>
> The order of evaluation of the bindings themselves is specified by
> letrec*.
>
> But the order of evaluation of the argument expressions in an
> invocation subexpression on the right-hand-side of a particular
> binding is not specified.
Ah, *that* order of evaluation. Thanks for explaining!
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Mon Feb 05 2007 - 13:47:38 UTC