[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI-39 should be made an R6RS library

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: AndrevanTonder <andre>
Date: Thu Feb 8 20:38:29 2007

On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, John Cowan wrote:

> I have searched the various status reports and seen nothing about
> dynamic binding, dynamic variables, or parameters. I suggest
> that SRFI-39 be incorporated into R6RS as the (r6rs parameters)
> library.

Yes, I agree. Please standardize parameters.

Andre
Received on Thu Feb 08 2007 - 20:32:02 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Cowan: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] The standard-*-port procedures should return a fresh binary port"
Previous message: Per Bothner: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] The standard-*-port procedures should return a fresh binary port"
In reply to: John Cowan: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI-39 should be made an R6RS library"
Next in thread: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI-39 should be made an R6RS library"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC