[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Rename named `let'

From: Michael Sperber <sperber>
Date: Fri Jan 26 08:36:32 2007

Eli Barzilay <eli_at_barzilay.org> writes:

> What I meant was that adding a name to a `let' (moving from [3] to
> [1]) does not change the meaning of the expression. But adding a name
> to a `letrec' (moving from [4] to [1]) does -- at least as far as I
> can tell from [0].

Ah, thanks for explaining, I get your point. I guess that's an
argument for not moving named `let' to `letrec'.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Fri Jan 26 2007 - 08:36:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC