[r6rs-discuss] hello.0.4.2.sls vs. hello-0.4.2.sls
Hi,
Shiro Kawai <shiro at lava.net> writes:
> IMHO, if the editors really concern about that, R6RS should *define*
> the mapping; either limiting the identifiers for library names
> so that they can be mapped to pathnames straightforwardly, or
> provide a standard escaping rules.
Speaking of that, the recent change in I/O module names from `i/o' to
`io' was probably the consequence of this observation.
However, I find `i/o' better looking and implementations should be able
to deal with slashes quite easily (e.g., by converting slashes to
hyphens or whatever).
I also agree that this should be left for standardization as an SRFI.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
Received on Fri Jun 29 2007 - 11:47:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC