Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak_at_knm.org.pl> writes:
> 5.1. Conventions for naming function parameters list "bytes" twice,
> with different meanings.
>
> 6.2. "p_a + q_q" should be "p_a + q_a", "p_b + q_q" should be
> "p_b + q_a".
These will be fixed in the next revision.
> 9.6. It's unspecified how eqv? and eq? behave for the unspecified
> value and the eof object, i.e. whether they can be two eof
> objects which are not eqv? to each other. Is this intentional?
> I think they should be treated like the empty list, i.e.
> a guaranteed singleton, especially in the sense of eqv?.
That's an oversight. It will be fixed in the next revision.
Thanks for spotting these!
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Thu Oct 05 2006 - 05:32:01 UTC