[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI-39 should be made an R6RS library

From: R. Kent Dybvig <dyb>
Date: Sat Feb 10 12:01:39 2007

> Sure. All I'm arguing for is not making the wrong decision. The
> interaction that SRFI 39 entails happens to be particularly hideous,
> and unnecessary at that.

Actually, Chez Scheme's threads and parameters get along perfectly well.
We have both global and thread parameters, and most parameters end up
being thread parameters. So I respectfully disagree that the interaction
is hideous---or even bad.

Kent
Received on Sat Feb 10 2007 - 12:01:03 UTC