[r6rs-discuss] bum spec for binary-port?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Michael Sperber <sperber>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:44:36 +0200

William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:

> In the 5.94 draft, the specification of binary-port?
> is exactly the same as the specification of textual-port?.

Fixed. Thanks!

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla

Received on Thu Jun 14 2007 - 02:44:36 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] and/or error"
Previous message: Jed Davis: "[r6rs-discuss] and/or error"
In reply to: William D Clinger: "[r6rs-discuss] bum spec for binary-port?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC